Global climate change impacts us all but as with everything some will benefit and some will be harmed. The argument can be made that those who will be most harmed are a) more numerous and b) almost wholly not responsible for its cause. The happy isles of Oceania and the Indian Ocean may in fact simply disappear under ocean waves. The Islamic Republic of the Maldives’ new President Mohammed Nasheed recently announced the formation of a one billion USD sovereign fund to buy land in other parts of the globe to resettle Maldivians whose atolls disappear. Tuvalu, formerly known as the Ellice Islands, is making plans to evacuate the entire population of the country to New Zealand should the Pacific consume the low-lying country. Today in the United Kingdom, scientists announced a breakthrough that allows scientists to judge the role man-made climate change played in extreme weather events and now experts believe that this might open the door for lawsuits from the adversely-affected.
From the UK Guardian:
People affected by worsening storms, heatwaves and floods could soon be able to sue the oil and power companies they blame for global warming, a leading climate expert has said.
Myles Allen, a physicist at Oxford University, said a breakthrough that allows scientists to judge the role man-made climate change played in extreme weather events could see a rush to the courts over the next decade.
He said: “We are starting to get to the point that when an adverse weather event occurs we can quantify how much more likely it was made by human activity. And people adversely affected by climate change today are in a position to document and quantify their losses. This is going to be hugely important.”
Allen’s team has used the new technique to work out whether global warming worsened the UK floods in autumn 2000, which inundated 10,000 properties, disrupted power supplies and led to train services being cancelled, motorways closed and 11,000 people evacuated from their homes – at a total cost of £1bn.
He would not comment on the results before publication, but said people affected by floods could “potentially” use a positive finding to begin legal action.