For the past two months I have been posting the new campaign ads as they are released. I subscribe not only to the various campaign feeds but also to various other feeds from across the political spectrum in addition to three independent sources. On any given day, I have a score or more television, radio or Internet spots hit my desk. And I began noticing something the past couple of weeks, or actually not noticing something. There is a paucity of Barack Obama ads compared to McCain or even Nader. I’ve wondered why the number of Obama ads were so few. I even commented on it once or twice before. Now I know why. The Obama campaign is not releasing the negative attacks ads. It is largely only releasing the positive ones. I am a bit peeved (okay I am furious) because I actually had cut Obama some slack noting the positive nature of his ads.
I really do try to take an objective view point on these ads. I feel a bit abused. I post them so people across the country and across the world can see how the US Presidential race is being waged. The US Presidential Race is really 51 separate races and ads are created to target specific states or regions or demographic groups. An ad in Boston is often different from an ad shown in Kansas City. With the Obama campaign withholding some of its ads, those of us covering his media campaign did not get the full picture. Simply put, Obama manipulated media observers and the blogging community. Once again Obama shows how deceptive he can be and why I don’t trust him.
From MSNBC:
Obama’s stealth ad campaign: Over the past week, we’ve gotten our hands on a number of negative TV ads Obama’s been running against McCain in key states like Ohio and Michigan. This is in addition to the tough spot, uncovered by Politico [*** UPDATE *** Actually the spot was uncovered by the Washington Times' Christina Bellantoni, who reported on it yesterday and was linked to by Politico] , that Obama’s airing in Indiana. Clearly, the Obama campaign isn’t interested in telling the media about every single McCain attack ad they’re running. Perhaps this is because Obama’s brand can’t afford to be tarnished too much if he’s seen as constantly running negative TV ads. So the campaign simply puts them on the air in key markets, doesn’t tell the press about them, and layers those ads with positive ones being run nationally during the Olympics. Also, by not releasing to the media, it forces the McCain camp to wait a day or two before they see the ad. McCain’s camp is much more comfortable unveiling their negative ads, perhaps because they want the free press that comes with them. But make no mistake, Obama’s running plenty of negative TV ads, particularly in the industrial Midwestern states. In fact, one of Obama’s biggest candidate strengths — which doesn’t get the attention it deserves — is that he plays political hardball as well as his opponents; he just sometimes does it under the radar.
The emphasis is mine. I’m pretty angry. I cut him some slack and I feel once again thrown under the bus. The above ad is an Obama campaign ad currently being run in Indiana.
I have created a new category called US Campaign Ads so as to make it more convenient for the readership to access. They have been filed so far under the individual candidates. I hope you find this service useful and enjoyable.

