
After college I had taken a job in Europe and before leaving the American West I wanted to see the American West so with a buddy I trekked up to Yellowstone National Park for some backcountry camping. Before they would issue us our permits, we had to attend a short lecture by the Park Rangers on do’s and don’ts in the wilderness. One of the phrases that stuck with us on that hike was the ranger’s admonishment of “do not feed the bears, do not taunt the bears.” When it comes to the Russian bear, that dictum also holds true.
Western Misteps and Western Impotence
As Russian tanks and jets effect the de facto separation of South Ossetia from Georgia, the West seems content with calls for a ceasefire and Russian withdrawal to the status quo ante. President Bush in Beijing, who met with Russian Prime Minister Putin yesterday, today urged Moscow to stop bombing immediately, saying it marked a dangerous escalation. Pity his government didn’t notice Russian tanks massing at the border the past weeks or worse take the Russians at their word that recognition of Kosovo would bring a response or that missle defence shields in the Czech Republic and Poland would be seen as a threat to Russian security. In the Georgian crisis of 2008, there is much blame to spread across most of the West.
Recognizing Kosovo was a blunder of historic proportions. More prudent is the government of Brazil that said it would recognize Kosovo when Serbia did. That, of course, is the tact to take. But to appease Islamic governments in the Middle East or to assauge a guilty conscience because the West failed to prevent ethnic cleansing in the Balkans, the West largely rushed headlong into recognition of a state that has no business being a state setting a dangerous precedent and opening up a Pandora’s box of would-be mini states in Transdniester, South Ossetia, Northern Cyprus and Abkhazia.
The Next Generation: Lost in Space
With Bush’s missteps and impotence all too evident and US elections under three months away, we of course have the two US Presidential candidates weighing in with pronouncements. One is utterly naive and so lost in the halls of silliness with empty rhetoric that one wonders if he took courses in appeasement at Harvard Law; the other is more reality based yet offers little concrete solutions as to how he would actually tackle the problem, other than by a return to a Cold War, of a resurgent Russia that can and will increasingly say nyet to the West.
McCain, a long-time outspoken critic of Putin’s Moscow, noted the situation in Georgia was dire. “Tensions and hostilities between Georgians and Ossetians are in no way justification for Russian troops crossing an internationally recognized border,” he said in a statement. He added “I again call on the government of Russia to immediately and unconditionally withdraw its forces from the territory of Georgia.”
McCain added, “Given this threat to Euro-Atlantic security, I am pleased to see the United States, the European Union, and NATO acting together by sending a delegation to the region, in an effort to broker a cease fire. This is an important first step.” A bit divorced from reality, however. There will be a cease fire when Russia is ready for one, not before. You would think he would know this given American adventurism around the world over the course of his lifetime. Superpowers say when, others acquiesce. Or you stop them before they get going. Since it is too late for that, Russia will present a fait accompli.
To his credit, McCain has been criticizing Russia for years, particularly for what he sees as its backsliding on democratic reforms and human rights. “For many years, I have warned against Russian actions that undermine the sovereignty of its neighbors,” he said. “Unfortunately, we have seen in recent days Russia demonstrate that these concerns were well-founded.” My question for McCain is will your bite match your bark? What steps will you take? Will you move to freeze Russian assets? Inhibit Russian travel abroad? Kicking Russia out of the G-8, as McCain has threatened to do, hardly seems appropriate either. Isolating Russia isn’t the answer, confronting it by engaging it is likely to yield better results. This is not the Russia of yore either. Its citizens no longer want for consumer goods and they now travel the world, and often first class at that. We’d be better off approaching them and convincing them that being Western means an open society at home.
Obama also condemned “the violation of Georgia’s sovereignty” and said that “Russia must stop its bombing campaign, cease flights of Russian aircraft in Georgian airspace and withdraw its ground forces from Georgia.” In his statement, Obama called for direct talks among all sides and said the United States, the U.N. Security Council and other parties should try to help bring about a peaceful resolution. Kumbaya my lord, kumbaya, oh lord kumbaya.
“I condemn Russia’s aggressive actions and reiterate my call for an immediate ceasefire,” Obama said in a statement. Bravo. Did you get it on tape? Historians will want it for the great moments in irrelevancy series.
“Russia must stop its bombing campaign, cease flights of Russian aircraft in Georgian airspace, and withdraw its ground forces from Georgia.” Or what? What actions precisely can you take or are you prepared to take? If you’re playing hard ball on the international stage with Putin, you’d better be play to actually effect something, otherwise Putin is going to run circles around you as he has around a much more savvy Bush. Let me remind the very junior Senator from Illinois that in the past year, Russia launched a cyber-attack on Estonia and cut off gas supplies to the Czech Republic and if you think that Russia isn’t prepared to freeze Europeans in their own homes, think again.
Late to the game as always, Obama has now stepped up his criticism of Russia since the crisis started. He has called for an international peacekeeping force and said Russia could not be a neutral mediator for political disputes over South Ossetia and Abkhazia — both pro-Russian separatist regions backed by Moscow. Unfortuantely Obama seems to forget that back in 1992-93, we as part of a United Nations Security Council resolution agreed to have a Russian peacekeeping force in South Ossetia. We are powerless. We lost this round. Let’s not lose the next one.
“The current escalation of military conflict resulted in part from the lack of a neutral and effective peacekeeping force operating under an appropriate UN mandate,” Obama said. “Russia cannot play a constructive role as peacekeeper.” Memo to Obama, Russia is a permanent member of the Security Council with veto power. Do you really think that Moscow is going to back a multi-national UN peacekeeping force on its southern flank? How out of touch can you be? That statement speaks volumes as to how inexperienced Obama is and why he is unqualified to be Commander in Chief.
Obama states the obvious and ignores the reality. You can’t dictate to a permanent member of the Security Council, Russia can say nyet and there’s nothing we can do about it. China and Russia vetoed a resolution on tightening sanctions on Zimbabwe and you think Russia is going to go for mediation and foreign troops on or near its soil?
Furthermore while perhaps in American jurisprudence parties to a conflict do not serve as mediators, in international conflicts that’s not the case. The United States serves a mediator in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict despite the fact that we are Israel’s strongest ally. Or take the case of Turkey in northern Cyprus which Turkey invaded in the 1974 and has occupied since. For better or for worse, Turkey is a mediator in that conflict. Unlike plaintiffs and defendants in a civil case, nation-states have armies and they are all too often willing to use them. Learn the difference between de facto and de jure. That might help. I can just imagine Obama meeting with Putin. At Harvard Law, they said this. To which, Putin would say at the KGB we do it this way. Obama says de jure with rhetoric, Putin says de facto with tanks.
Czechoslovakia 1938, Georgia 2008
Georgia will be dismembered, of that I have little doubt. De facto now and likely de jure in time. The West most certainly will not risk confrontation with Russia over South Ossetia and Abkhazia. Short of war, we have no leverage because we abdicated our responsibilty to engage Russia and change Russia forever, to make it truly Western. Instead, we largely ignored Russia during the Clinton and Bush years and now we find ourselves confronting a Russia that has remade itself on its own terms.
In Eastern Europe, we chose to win at the margin. We took the Warsaw Pact, the Baltics, the Ukraine and the Caucusus and made them part of our world. They, no doubt, were ready and willing to join the West but so was Russia and we ignored them. Why? Because it would cost too much. Pity because it is likely to cost us far more now. Engagement was the answer then as it is now.
Now we face Putin’s Russia, an authoritarian state and one with some of the world’s richest energy reserves in an energy starved world. Indeed, some have called Russia a “petrostate”. But unlike other petrostates like Venezuela, Saudi Arabia and Iran, Russia has been a world power since the days of Catherine the Great and under Vladmir the Nasty it aims to recapture its standing in the world by hook or by crook.
We need to confront the reality that Russia is again a world power and an authoritarian state with its own agenda. And this Russia has something more potent than nuclear weapons, it has oil and natural gas. We will sacrifice Georgia like we sacrificed Czechoslovakia in 1938 because then as now we are impotent. And as we face this election in the United States, we can elect Neville Obama or Winston McCain. Franklin Clinton is sadly not an option.
World Editorials
Prisoner of the Caucasus from UK Guardian.
Russia is asking for trouble in Georgia from the Financial Times.
Eruption of War in South Ossetia from the Irish Times.
Russia On the March from the UK Telegraph. A snippet from the UK Telegraph editorial:
Make no mistake about the unequal nature of this struggle. Georgia has nine jet fighters, while Russia boasts 1,736. Georgia possesses 128 tanks – compared with Russia’s 23,000. Imagine, for a moment, that Nato leaders had granted Mr Saakashvili’s request for a “membership action plan” during their last summit in Bucharest. Would Russia have dared act in this way if Georgia had been firmly on the path to joining NATO?
Privately, Georgian officials warned that denying this request would give Russia a window of opportunity to sabotage their prospects of NATO membership. President George W. Bush was the only leader who publicly supported Georgia’s position precisely because America feared that anything less would trigger Russian intervention. Sadly, his judgment has been vindicated.
Stopping Russia in the Washington Post.
World Op-Eds
How Georgia fell into its enemies’ trap by Edward Lucas in the Times of London.
Taunting the Bear by James Traub in the New York Times.
Comment & Articles on European Blogs
When Conflicts Thaw: South Ossetia by Doug Merrill of Fistful of Euros.
South Ossetia: Alea Jacta Est by Douglas Muir of Fistful of Euros.
Wannabe NATO member on the Warpath by Jerome a Paris of the European Tribune.
McCain’s Wrong on Russia and So Is Obama by Paul Saunders and Brooke Leonard of Russia Blog.
Return to Main