US Africa Command Center Put on Back Burner

Africom

In February 2007, President Bush announced that the United States would create a new military command for Africa, to be known as the Africa Command or AFRICOM, to protect U.S. national security interests on the African continent. Previously, control over U.S. military operations in Africa was divided between three different commands: European Command, which oversaw North Africa and most of sub-Saharan Africa; Central Command, which had responsibility for Egypt and the Horn of Africa; and Pacific Command, which administered the Indian Ocean and Madagascar.

The new command set up shop in Stuttgart, Germany in October 2007, as a sub-command of the European Command, and is scheduled to become a separate, fully independent command in October 2008. The Pentagon has intended to establish a headquarters – or set of regional headquarters – on the African continent. But now those plans appear on hold.

Via South Africa’s Mail & Guardian:

Controversy surrounding the United States military’s new Africa Command has forced the Pentagon to put plans for establishing a headquarters in the continent on a slow track, US defence officials said on Friday.

The Pentagon still hopes to have a command headquarters in Africa, but officials acknowledge it will take time to overcome negative regional perceptions.

The problem became evident when General William Ward, the head of Africom, toured the region after assuming his post in October and found that Africans were convinced the United States wanted to establish bases and send troops to the region.

The Pentagon insists it has no plans for either permanent bases or garrison troops in Africa, only a more focused effort to help train and equip African militaries.

The US currently has a few survellience posts in Africa. The largest is in Djbouti on the Horn of Africa.

Return to Main

robin
June 8th, 2008 16:50

Charles, I have been enjoying your comments over at The Confluence and happy to have discovered this site, where I will be happily lurking often. I would love to get your insight into an issue that has been intriguing me and which I am surprised hasn’t gotten much traction i.e. Obama’s involvement in the Presidential election of Kenya and what you think his role in Africa in general would be, if he became president. I wonder what kind of involvement he had/has in Kenya. The “pro bono” involvement of Dick Morris in the Odinga campaign is interesting. What do you think?

June 8th, 2008 17:24

Well thank you and welcome. I do consider The Confluence sort of my sister site. My blog was in part inspired by theirs. As RiverDaughter took the confluence that forms the Ohio, I took by the fault as a reference that I live in SF. Granted, my scope goes beyond the US Presidential election and internal Democratic Party politics.

I was also a late comer to Clinton. I was in the Edwards camp prior.

Off the top of my head, Obama’s involvement in the Kenyan election of January was marginal. Kenya like most African states is a multi-ethinc society and ethnic tensions spill on the street especially as economic conditions worsen. Kenya also has had one of the fastest growing populations in the world and that has been an anchor on Kenyan development. The country can’t grow fast enough to deliver employment opportunities. Odinga is like Obama of the Luo tribe. From what I have read and heard is not a likeable fellow but few politicians in Africa are. The state is all too often seen as a vehicle for personal enrichment. There are exceptions to this: Senegal, Botswana, Mali, Malawi, Angola, Rwanda and Ethiopia are the more better ruled places. Rwanda is really on the cusp of great things.

Until the collapse of the Soviet Union and the South African apartheid regime, Africa was largely just a place for the superpowers to conduct war by proxy. Africa as a whole is now much poorer than it was at independence. Still both Europe and the United States have become more involved in the continent. Both Clinton and Bush 43 did a lot work there. Africa is one of Bush’s few positive successes. In this sense, whomever is the next president of the US will likely build on the foundations built by Clinton and Bush. My worry on Africa geo-politically is of course China’s growing involvement as the mad dash for untapped natural resources develops. And the global food crisis, which I cover as extensively as I can, is likely to impact Africa more severely than anywhere else. While there are poor people the world over, in Africa, they form 80% of the population. They live on $3 a day or less.

Dick Morris has ties everywhere. Somewhere there is a pond missing its scum.

June 9th, 2008 00:58

Robin, here is a story of interest for you

Kenya on Obama

robin
June 9th, 2008 10:47

Thanks for your insights and for the link, Charles. I really appreciate it. The Nation op-ed highlights some of the things I am concerned about. Obamania is global, I guess. Interesting BTW that he refers to Obama as a possible “agent of change”, which is what Odinga called his followers (called ODM drones by some critics). There’s that word “change” again…

Given the importance of Africa and since Senator Obama is offering this August 2006 trip as one of his few foreign policy experiences, I think it bears closer scrutiny than it has gotten in the press so far. In fact, Obama went to great pains to make sure that the press coverage was universally positive. He went so far as to call a Chicago columnist (Neil Steinberg) while he was still in Kenya to express his anger and offense that the columnist “presented his trip to Africa not as the sincere personal odyssey that the seal pack of journalists following him are describing, but as calculated political theater.”

What exactly was he trying to achieve on his Africa trip and who was the intended audience? Was he trying to present himself as the darling of the masses? The One Who Speaks Truth to Power? How much calculation went into his public criticism of Mbeki in South Africa regarding HIV, and of Kibeki in Kenya regarding corruption and tribalism? Mbeki refused to see him and Kibaki issued a complaint. We can only conclude one of two things, I think. Either these were naive gaffes based on foreign policy inexperience or there is a long term strategy involved. Both conclusions require further scrutiny.

Regarding his appearances with Raila Odinga at the AIDS clinic and at his father’s home town, what was the goal? Was he being used by Odinga or was there a strategy there? Are we later going to hear “That’s not the Raila that I knew”?

Given that Dick Morris was involved and that the election ended in such a horrible way, again it bears more scrutiny. There are some odd similarities in the Odinga campaign and Obama’s. Every time Dick Morris makes an appearance it is cause for concern and the timing of his arrival in Kenya to help the Odinga campaign is curious.

I don’t know and I don’t have any theories about it. Maybe I am overthinking it but it bothers me and would love to know what is going on. My personal prejudice is that I don’t like *movements* with charismatic leaders and adoring followers with an uncritical press; it just makes me nervous.

You must be logged in to post a comment.